Cramster.com - Homework Solutions, Lecture Notes, Exams, and Free Online Homework Help
Sign Up Now! Login Help Cramster Blog
Problem Solved.
    Home    
    Homework Help    
   Answer Board   
    Resources (Beta)    
   
Member's Topic Headline:

Human-Computer Interaction ?

Know the answer? Have a better solution? Share it.
Get Help Now.
View homework problems
explained for free!
Member Testimonials

Question:

Advertisement:

Answer | Ask New Question | Customize Profile | Leaderboards | 
FAQ

Member's Avatar

Rookie
Karma Points: 0
Respect (100%):
Date Posted: 5/16/2008 6:59:26 AM  Status: Live
Human-Computer Interaction ?
Course Textbook Chapter Problem
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Question Details:
Please Help the following Questions?

Q: 1. Which of the following applications would be best suitable to having pop-up pie menus, pull-down categorical menus or fixed-matrix menus? Give reason to justify your answer.

a)      A word processing system.
b)      A radar warning system.

 Q: 2. What will a modeless dialogue box let the user do that a model dialogue box prevents?

 Q: 3. Why do you think that the requirements specification often fails to clarify responsibilities?

 

Answers:

Member's Avatar

Expert
Karma Points: 899
Date Posted: 5/16/2008 8:53:49 AM  Status: Live
Asker's Rating: Somewhat Helpful   
Response:

For Question no 3:


An SRS is basically an organization's understanding (in
writing) of a customer or potential client's system
requirements and dependencies at a particular point in
time
(usually) prior to any actual design or development
work. It's a two-way insurance policy that assures that both
the client and the organization understand the other's
requirements from that perspective at a given point in
time.

The SRS document itself states in precise and explicit
language those functions and capabilities a software system
(i.e., a software application, an eCommerce Web site, and so
on) must provide, as well as states any required constraints by
which the system must abide. The SRS also functions as a
blueprint for completing a project with as little cost growth
as possible. The SRS is often referred to as the "parent"
document because all subsequent project management documents,
such as design specifications, statements of work, software
architecture specifications, testing and validation plans, and
documentation plans, are related to it.

It's important to note that an SRS contains functional and
nonfunctional requirements only; it doesn't offer design
suggestions, possible solutions to technology or business
issues, or any other information other than what the
development team understands the customer's system requirements
to be.

A well-designed, well-written SRS accomplishes four major
goals:

  • It provides feedback to the customer. An SRS is the
    customer's assurance that the development organization
    understands the issues or problems to be solved and the
    software behavior necessary to address those problems.
    Therefore, the SRS should be written in natural language
    (versus a formal language, explained later in this
    article), in an unambiguous manner that may also include
    charts, tables, data flow diagrams, decision tables, and so
    on.
  • It decomposes the problem into component parts. The
    simple act of writing down software requirements in a
    well-designed format organizes information, places borders
    around the problem, solidifies ideas, and helps break down
    the problem into its component parts in an orderly
    fashion.
  • It serves as an input to the design specification. As
    mentioned previously, the SRS serves as the parent document
    to subsequent documents, such as the software design
    specification and statement of work. Therefore, the SRS
    must contain sufficient detail in the functional system
    requirements so that a design solution can be devised.
  • It serves as a product validation check. The SRS also
    serves as the parent document for testing and validation
    strategies that will be applied to the requirements for
    verification.

SRSs are typically developed during the first stages of
"Requirements Development," which is the initial product
development phase in which information is gathered about what
requirements are needed--and not. This information-gathering
stage can include onsite visits, questionnaires, surveys,
interviews, and perhaps a return-on-investment (ROI) analysis
or needs analysis of the customer or client's current business
environment. The actual specification, then, is written after
the requirements have been gathered and analyzed.

Technical Writers be Involved with SRS

Unfortunately, much of the time, systems architects and
programmers write SRSs with little (if any) help from the
technical communications organization. And when that assistance
is provided, it's often limited to an edit of the final draft
just prior to going out the door. Having technical writers
involved throughout the entire SRS development process can
offer several benefits:

  • Technical writers are skilled information gatherers,
    ideal for eliciting and articulating customer requirements.
    The presence of a technical writer on the
    requirements-gathering team helps balance the type and
    amount of information extracted from customers, which can
    help improve the SRS.
  • Technical writers can better assess and plan
    documentation projects and better meet customer document
    needs. Working on SRSs provides technical writers with an
    opportunity for learning about customer needs
    firsthand--early in the product development process.
  • Technical writers know how to determine the questions
    that are of concern to the user or customer regarding ease
    of use and usability. Technical writers can then take that
    knowledge and apply it not only to the specification and
    documentation development, but also to user interface
    development, to help ensure the UI (User Interface) models
    the customer requirements.
  • Technical writers, involved early and often in the
    process, can become an information resource throughout the
    process, rather than an information gatherer at the end of
    the process.

In short, a requirements-gathering team consisting solely of
programmers, product marketers, systems analysts/architects,
and a project manager runs the risk of creating a specification
that may be too heavily loaded with technology-focused or
marketing-focused issues. The presence of a technical writer on
the team helps place at the core of the project those user or
customer requirements that provide more of an overall balance
to the design of the SRS, product, and documentation.

A sample of a more detailed SRS outline

1. Scope

1.1 Identification.

Identify the system and the software to which
this document applies, including, as applicable,
identification number(s), title(s),
abbreviation(s), version number(s), and release
number(s).

1.2 System overview.

State the purpose of the system or subsystem
to which this document applies.

1.3 Document overview.

Summarize the purpose and contents of this
document.

This document comprises six sections:

  • Scope
  • Referenced documents
  • Requirements
  • Qualification provisions
  • Requirements traceability
  • Notes

Describe any security or privacy considerations
associated with its use.

2. Referenced Documents

2.1 Project documents.

Identify the project management system
documents here.

2.2 Other documents.

2.3 Precedence.

2.4 Source of documents.

3. Requirements

This section shall be divided into paragraphs to
specify the Computer Software Configuration Item (CSCI) requirements, that is, those characteristics
of the CSCI that are conditions for its acceptance.
CSCI requirements are software requirements
generated to satisfy the system requirements
allocated to this CSCI. Each requirement shall be
assigned a project-unique identifier to support
testing and traceability and shall be stated in
such a way that an objective test can be defined
for it.

3.1 Required states and modes.

3.2 CSCI capability requirements.

3.3 CSCI external interface requirements.

3.4 CSCI internal interface requirements.

3.5 CSCI internal data requirements.

3.6 Adaptation requirements.

3.7 Safety requirements.

3.8 Security and privacy requirements.

3.9 CSCI environment requirements.

3.10 Computer resource requirements.

3.11 Software quality factors.

3.12 Design and implementation constraints.

3.13 Personnel requirements.

3.14 Training-related requirements.

3.15 Logistics-related requirements.

3.16 Other requirements.

3.17 Packaging requirements.

3.18 Precedence and criticality
requirements.

4. Qualification Provisions

To be determined.

5. Requirements Traceability

To be determined.

6. Notes

This section contains information of a general
or explanatory nature that may be helpful, but is
not mandatory.

6.1 Intended use.

This Software Requirements specification shall
...

6.2 Definitions used in this document.

Insert here an alphabetic list of definitions
and their source if different from the declared
sources specified in the "Documentation
standard."

6.3 Abbreviations used in this
document.

Insert here an alphabetic list of the
abbreviations and acronyms if not identified in the declared sources specified in the "Documentation
Standard."

6.4 Changes from previous issue.

Will be "not applicable" for the initial
issue.

Revisions shall identify the method used to
identify changes from the previous issue. 

khamkha's Comment:
Thanks lot please help other questions

If you post one question/problem, I will provide 1 input/answer. If you put "x" questions/problems, I will provide"x" inputs/answers.  In both cases, appropriate ratings are appreciated for every input. Thanks.



By reading or posting messages on these forums, you are agreeing to the Answer Board's Terms of Service and Conduct (TSC).


About Cramster | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Press Room | Site Map | Support | Anti-Cheating Policy

Cramster.com is not affiliated with any publisher. Book covers, title and author names appear for reference only.
Copyright © 2008 Cramster, Inc.